What Are the Objectives of Each Session?

 

Representing Wards in Criminal Matters

  • To identify the client in a guardianship case when the disabled person is charged with a crime.

  • To educate guardians about the need for separate competent representation for a ward’s criminal charge.

  • To examine the relationship between guardian and ward when the ward has personal counsel for criminal defense.

  • To illuminate how guardianship may fail to protect an incarcerated ward.

The Limitations of a Legal Guardian: Immigrants & John Doe Cases

  • To review status of funding, obstacles to service delivery, verification of immigration status, repatriation, and securing long term care placement.

  • To provide recommendations for handling situations.

  • To discuss the role of the service provider, guardian, and DHS-ICE.

Saving Granny: Using UAGPPJA to Protect the Rights of Persons with Disabilities who have Issues in Multiple Jurisdictions

  • To highlight the personal and financial toll on an incapacitated person and their family resulting from the lack of uniformity in state guardianship laws

  • To increase appreciation for the difficulties experienced by practitioners and parties when guardianship laws are not uniform.

  • To prepare participants to advocate for passage of UAGPPJA in their states; or apply new strategies for handling such cases in jurisdictions in which UAGPPJA has been enacted.

  • To establish a more advanced level of practice when adjudicating guardianship issues with cross-border implications.

Risky Business: How to Use the NGA Standards of Practice when Confronted with Worst Case Scenarios

  • To identify behaviors that create risks for both the ward and the guardian, including behaviors that could result in liability against the ward or the ward’s estate and even against the guardian.

  • To develop a greater understanding of how ‘worst case scenarios’ may impact on the provision of guardianship services, incur legal liability or cause other practical consequences. Guardians will be challenged to think more pro-actively about issues and laws relating to risky behaviors of wards.

  • To emphasize issues relating to a guardian’s ability to consent (or refuse consent) to requests to control risky behaviors and to advise guardians of legal and practical issues to consider when deciding consent requests.

  • To develop recommendations on how to respond to the issues through interactive, collaborative opportunities between the speakers and the audience.

Judges Panel - Case Studies

  • To engage participants in a stimulating and informative discussion of guardianship issues.

  • To provide a judge’s perspective of the difficult issues in guardianship and how courts confront these issues.

  • To question the judges on how a court might handle their problem.

  • To outline the best practices courts are using in guardianship.

Review Speaker Biographies and Other

Details at: www.guardianship.org/10ColloquiumRR